11 min read

How the NCC Is Starting to Address Embodied Carbon

By Team CE on May 27, 2025 11:24:21 AM

Australian building policy and embodied carbon reporting pathway review for commercial construction

NCC and Embodied Carbon

How the NCC Is Starting to Address Embodied Carbon

Embodied carbon is becoming more visible in Australian building policy, but project teams should be careful not to treat every emerging pathway as a current mandatory requirement.

The National Construction Code has traditionally focused on minimum requirements for safety, health, amenity, accessibility and building performance. As Australia’s building policy conversation evolves, embodied carbon is now becoming part of the wider discussion about how buildings are designed, specified, constructed and assessed.

For architects, builders, developers and consultants, the important point is not that every project suddenly has the same embodied carbon requirement. The more useful point is that embodied carbon measurement is becoming more familiar across commercial buildings, planning, rating tools, procurement and future regulation.

This means project teams need a clear understanding of what applies now, what may be voluntary, which frameworks are relevant and where future expectations may be heading.

In Brief

Embodied carbon is entering the NCC conversation, but the pathway depends on the project.

Emerging policy

Embodied carbon is becoming part of national building policy discussions and future construction expectations.

Commercial focus

The current national conversation is especially relevant to commercial buildings and NABERS Embodied Carbon pathways.

Careful interpretation

Project teams should confirm current requirements before assuming a formal embodied carbon report is mandatory.

What Is Changing Around Embodied Carbon?

Embodied carbon refers to the greenhouse gas emissions associated with building materials and construction processes. Depending on the assessment scope, this may include emissions from material extraction, manufacturing, transport, installation, replacement and end of life treatment.

Historically, building performance policy has focused more heavily on operational energy. This includes the energy used for heating, cooling, lighting, hot water and building services once a building is occupied. Embodied carbon brings attention to another part of the building lifecycle: the emissions associated with creating the building in the first place.

This does not replace operational energy performance. It adds another layer to how project teams think about carbon, material selection and long term environmental impact. For a broader introduction, read What Is Embodied Carbon in Buildings?.

Important Distinction

NCC 2025 Should Not Be Treated as a Blanket Embodied Carbon Mandate

One of the main risks with embodied carbon articles is overstating the current NCC position. Project teams should avoid assuming that all residential and non residential buildings now have the same mandatory embodied carbon reporting requirement under the NCC.

The safer way to understand the current direction is that embodied carbon is being introduced into the national building policy conversation, with voluntary and framework specific pathways playing an important role. This is especially relevant to commercial building contexts where NABERS Embodied Carbon may be used.

Because requirements can vary by building type, project location, approval pathway and rating framework, project teams should confirm the current applicable pathway before preparing embodied carbon documentation.

Where NABERS Embodied Carbon Fits

NABERS Embodied Carbon is one of the key pathways connected to embodied carbon measurement in Australia. It is designed to measure, verify and compare upfront embodied carbon for eligible buildings and relevant project types.

However, NABERS Embodied Carbon is not the same as every embodied carbon report. A general embodied carbon report may be prepared for design review, planning context, client reporting, material comparison or early stage carbon advice. NABERS Embodied Carbon has its own scope, rules, data expectations and verification pathway.

For a clearer comparison, read Embodied Carbon Report vs NABERS Embodied Carbon.

Project Preparation

What Project Teams Should Do Now

Even where a formal embodied carbon requirement does not yet apply, early preparation can help project teams become more confident with the data, methods and design decisions involved.

Understand whether the project is residential, commercial or infrastructure
Confirm whether NABERS, Green Star, LCA or another pathway applies
Review major carbon drivers such as structure, concrete, steel and façade systems
Gather drawings, specifications, quantities and material information early
Ask suppliers for Environmental Product Declarations where useful
Consider adaptive reuse and material efficiency before design decisions are locked in

These steps can make embodied carbon reporting easier later, whether the project needs a formal pathway now or is preparing for future expectations.

Why Early Design Decisions Matter

Embodied carbon is strongly shaped by early project decisions. Structural systems, building form, façade design, material selection, demolition, reuse and procurement assumptions can all affect the final carbon profile of a building.

If embodied carbon is only considered late in the project, there may be fewer opportunities to reduce emissions without affecting cost, programme or design intent. Early review gives the design team more time to understand where the largest impacts are likely to sit and whether practical alternatives exist.

For more detail, read What Information Is Needed for an Embodied Carbon Report?.

Assessment Pathways

Embodied Carbon Reporting vs Life Cycle Assessment

Embodied carbon reporting and Life Cycle Assessment are closely related, but they are not always the same thing. An embodied carbon report may focus specifically on greenhouse gas emissions associated with materials and construction. A Life Cycle Assessment may assess a broader range of environmental impacts and life cycle stages.

The right approach depends on the purpose of the assessment. A project may need a focused embodied carbon report, a NABERS Embodied Carbon pathway, a Green Star related assessment, an LCA or another reporting method.

For a clearer comparison, read Embodied Carbon Report vs Life Cycle Assessment.

Preparing for Future Embodied Carbon Expectations

The direction of travel is clear: embodied carbon is becoming more important in Australian building and construction. Future standards, rating tools, procurement requirements and planning expectations may continue to increase the need for clear carbon documentation.

Project teams do not need to wait for every future requirement to become mandatory before improving their process. Becoming familiar with embodied carbon measurement now can make future reporting easier and support better design decisions today.

For a broader view of methods and pathways, read Top Embodied Carbon Tools Available in Australia.

 

FAQ

Common Questions About the NCC and Embodied Carbon

Does NCC 2025 make embodied carbon reporting mandatory for every project?

No. Project teams should not treat NCC 2025 as a blanket embodied carbon mandate for every residential and commercial project. The relevant pathway depends on the building type, project context, location, approval pathway and rating framework.

Where does NABERS Embodied Carbon fit?

NABERS Embodied Carbon is a pathway for eligible buildings and project types to measure, verify and compare upfront embodied carbon. It has its own scope, rules, data expectations and verification process.

Should project teams prepare before embodied carbon becomes more common?

Yes. Even when a formal pathway does not yet apply, project teams can start by gathering better material information, reviewing carbon hotspots, asking for product data and considering embodied carbon earlier in design.

Is embodied carbon reporting the same as Life Cycle Assessment?

Not always. Embodied carbon reporting may focus on greenhouse gas emissions from materials and construction, while Life Cycle Assessment can assess a broader range of environmental impacts and life cycle stages.

Project Review

Need to understand which embodied carbon pathway may apply?

Certified Energy can review your project documentation and advise whether an embodied carbon report, Life Cycle Assessment, NABERS Embodied Carbon pathway or another reporting approach may be relevant.

Visit the Embodied Carbon Report Knowledge Hub
Team CE

Written by Team CE

Articles written by the Certified Energy technical team covering NatHERS, BASIX and building performance in Australia.